FOUR REASONS THAT FREE MARKET CAPITALISM IS A LIE

PART ONE OF AN ONGOING SERIES

First of all, let me say to my small group of readers that I have not been writing recently because of Fibromyalgea. My hands have been particularly stiff and sore. Even leaving a small comment on you tube has led to hours of pain. Never mind, someone has provided me with a small amount of alternative medication and I feel much better temporarily. It is a pity that it is illegal.

Of course, you know why it won't be legalised: first there is the very rich and powerful Alcohol lobby who see it as a threat. Then there are the Pharmaceutical companies, who despite trying to extract elements of cannabis to create painkillers, they can't do it without creating side effects such as an extremely dry mouth and lethargy, as ingesting cannabis will make you very sleepy indeed. (Unless, I must add, the user has M.E. Arthritis, Fibromyalgea or other diseases of the nervous system in which case it merely treats the symptoms.) Finally there is the Tobacco lobby. Weed is most definitely a threat to them. The reason it is a threat is that unlike Tobacco it is easy to grow in any climate (possibly not the Antarctic, admittedly!.)The bottom line is that we could all grow it ourselves which means that capitalists wouldn't make much profit. There is the nub of it: profit.

The reason for a "free market" is the pursuit of profit. This means that before anything else is considered, such as fair wages and good working conditions, or respect for the environment and the flora and fauna around us the capitalist will first ensure that it makes a large profit. Not just a profit, it wants THE MAXIMUM PROFIT POSSIBLE. Please note, I have not made an error when I call the capitalist "it". To my mind the greedy and ruthless amongst us are NOT human, they are sub-human. They have lost their humanity.

So the first point in the list to show that the "free market" is bogus is choice, as shown in the second paragraph of this piece. You cannot sell just anything that you want. Governments make laws at the request of their banking cartel overlords, particularly to protect their markets. The international bankers are drug dealers. SO are the UK and US governments. This Guardian article from 2009 tells us that the banking system may have collapsed altogether in the 2008 US property investment debacle IF IT WASN'T FOR DRUG MONEY!

A little googling will take you to many such articles about the international banking eugenicists. Fair enough, you might say, banks are dodgy and they don't care where they get their money from. Surely, though, our governments don't get involved in such things? Well, actually, yes they do. Britain went to war with China between the years 1829 and 1860. These wars were known as The Opium Wars, and the war started because China banned the use of Opium, which the British had plentiful supply of as they had control of the poppy growing areas of India  . Britains plan was to create a market of opium and Heroin addicts in China to supply to. Information can be found at Wikipedia or other sources such as THIS:

Even the government mouthpiece the BBC have the story. In modern times we have seen a steady increase in the production of Opium in Afghanistan since the US and Britain illegally invaded. In fact, just a year before the troops went in to quell the alleged terrorists of Al Queda (CIA) who all appear to dress up as women and children. Well they are the only dead bodies I have seen in the news (not the mainstream news, obviously, which fabricates reports.) Anyway, I digress. A year before the invasion  Al Queda burned all the opium fields. They were not in keeping with the teachings of Allah. Suddenly the US/UK invade and Opium production reaches record highs (pun intended).  Here is something else gob-smackily shocking for you to take in

- and for further reading:

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/05/has-the-u-s-government-ever-protected-drug-smugglers.html

http://www.mediaroots.org/opium-what-afghanistan-is-really-about/

So we have established that the Elites run a system that  restricts freedom of choice whilst hypocritically making money out of drugs. Typical. That's why all the big drug dealers, the ones who supply the guys who sell on the street all invariably work for the establishment. The Opium wars example shows us that the establishment are always willing to threaten war if they don't get what they want. Hence the invasion of Afghanistan.

Moving on, and linking with the above point on choice we have our "f(r)iend" the BBC. Not only has this insidious organization been shown to be rife with pedophilia  and to have done nothing about it they have also been caught out faking a news item on a chemical attack by Syrian rebels (For rebels, read : people who disagree with American/UK foreign policy). This item from You tube is an eye-opener:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Fc6vBCjVmA

more HERE and HERE

It is interesting to see HERE that the moderator of this site has removed the video and closed the topic from furthar discussion:


Be aware, my friends, that the media is doing exactly the same thing in the Ukraine. In the interest of fairness I have to declare that I have watched videos on staged media events before that show that Russia Today is as guilty as the others when it comes to staging "news" items, although CNN comes out on top ( Isn't that station owned by that three nationality illuminati supporting Rupert Murdock? Owner of the British Sun "newspaper?). Actually this guy ought to change his surname from Murdock to Mudrake. Its more accurate.

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/02/is-everything-in-the-mainstream-media-fake-6-examples-of-media-manipulation-2908122.html

Anyway, back to the BBC and why they show us that there is not a free market. Whilst every other station has to attract advertising and sponsorship to keep running, the BBC is protected from the lows of the free market economy because every person that owns a TV, even if that person does not watch the BBC because it is a paedos paradise and is run by EU supporting liars they still have to pay £145.50 a year for a license. EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE A TV!!! If you have a PC, laptop or a gaming device that can get you online you still have to have a license. EFFING NAZIS! They should be made to sink or swim, like every other media company. Shove your TV license where the sun doesn't shine!
The media in general is owned by capitalists who also own companies and products that manufacture goods that their media section will endorse and promote. This give an edge over small and medium sized family run businesses which makes it easier to drive these out of business or buy them out. Our high streets nowadays have no charm or character because there are very few small, privately owned shops. We are awash in corporate world when we visit our town centres. The world I grew up in has gone completely and has been replaced by a lifeless glass and plastic environment devoid of spirit.


So to recap, as I seem to be babbling on a bit. It must be because I haven't written for a while ( is it still called writing if technically you are typing?) Anyway, Choice is determined by the rich, and in some cases restricted by them, and the media gives the same powerful groups (only FIVE companies own all the media in the US) an advatage through self promotion and state/corporate control of the media. This brings me to the next point, point number three: advertising.


Advertising in the mass media was invented by Edward Bernays, Nephew of Freud, initiator of mind control through psychiatry.Like his uncle he knew that the way to peoples wallets and purses was through their minds. His thinking is not a million miles away from social Darwinism, which is at the root of Eugenics. Basically he thought that wonderful middle class people such as himself had to herd the masses in the "right" direction. We lowly mortals are irrational and think with a "herd" mentality, according to Bernays. The people like HIM had a duty to steer society in the right way, which meant using psychoanalysis and theories of crowd behaviour and control mixed with Pavlovian stimulus/response theory to elicit desired behaviours in the "herd". One thing has to be made clear about the work of Bernays. Although he developed the use of press releases and advertising his main aim was to sell stories and products AS NEWS ITEMS . He also brought in the format of presenting an "impartial authority" to endorse products. His perverted way of thinking, putting ideas and desires in consumers heads led to the success of alcohol and cigarettes. He is responsible for cancer and liver disease. What a guy!

Advertising is based on lies and misinformation. It is all about deception because advertising seeks to create a need for something that there was previously no real desire for. Advertising sells concepts, dreams, lifestyles. You only have to watch adverts on TV to see how ridiculous they are and how far removed the image being  sold is from the actual product being sold. Think of all those grandiose car adverts, designed to make you change to a new car sooner than you really need to so that you can enjoy all the lovely new features. Mobile phone ads are the same. Samsung are trying to sell us the S5 currently, I'm still paying for the S bloody 3!!! Give us a break, for goodness sake.

As well as selling us things that we don't really need and can ill afford (don't worry if you are poor. Your friend the money lender will give you credit - and seize your goods later) the system is set up for point number four: they sell us things that have a built in lifetime. There is no way a capitalist is going to sell you a washing machine that will last for twenty years. If you don't need another before then, how does it keep on selling its washing machines? Most white goods come with a 5 year warranty for a reason - that's about how long they last. And have you noticed that since the dawning of the age of electronics your electrical goods have no serviceable parts? That is designed to stop people fixing things up themselves and forcing them into buying a new one. Being anti capitalist ( the current monetarist form of it, anyway) I always try and reuse whatever I can. The system gets as little of my money as I can get away with giving.

Mass production is set up to produce goods that will fail. Another way of robbing the consumer is by making things obsolete. As a kid I bought "Dark Side of the Moon". Then the capitalist elite (music branch) decided to stop producing vinyl and replace it with cassettes. I had a copy of the aforementioned Pink Floyd album on tape, for my new Walkman. Then tape is discarded and they bring in CDs. How many times do they want you to buy the same music? No wonder people Pirate. Well, that and the fact that the goods are overpriced and few people want to pay for them. Plus nobody has a job any more. What are we supposed to use to buy with?

In closing this first part I will summarise. The capitalist decides what products are available. It uses unfair competition. It can afford to blanket advertise which puts smaller companies at a disadvantage. They own the raw materials which smaller competition relies on and they sell it to them at an inflated price to drive up their overheads. Worst of all they sell us goods that will last a short time and that have no serviceable parts.

There is loads more to uncover but already it is evident that "free" market capitalism is a lie. The market is controlled by big money as I shall outline in the next blog.

REMEMBER: DON'T BE FOOLED BY THE RULES, AND DON'T BE RULED BY THE FOOLS!